MENTAL
 Main Menu
 Fundamentals
 Dialogical Principle


Dialogical Principle
 DIALOGICAL
PRINCIPLE

"Reality is dialectical" (Hegel).

"Dialectics is the science of universal interconnectedness" (Engels).

"Nothing exists except in relation to its opposite" (Paul Twitchell).

"The space where the dialectic between philosophy and science can be well understood is language" (Wittgenstein).



The Union of Opposites

We perceive and conceive the world structured in pairs of opposites such as: light-dark, hot-cold, dry-humid, high-low, rich-poor, and so on. Our language also reflects these opposing concepts.

In nature, these opposites are governed by a force, energy or power that transcends them, harmonizes them and makes them complementary to each other. For many cultures, contacting or tuning in to that higher power that transcends duality means attaining wisdom.

The ancient Greeks called this power "Logos", which not only harmonized the opposites, but was also the generator of them. The Logos manifests itself as the universal pattern of opposites.

At the superficial level, the opposites appear separate and unrelated to each other. At the deep level, the opposites are connected. Consciousness connects the opposites and the union of the opposites produces consciousness.

The union of the opposites is symbolized by the Ouroboros, the mythical serpent that bites its own tail. It symbolizes consciousness, with its properties of circularity, feedback and self-reflection.

Ouroboros


Features of the union of opposites.
History of the union of opposites.
The Dialectic
.
The Concept

Two antagonistic yet complementary terms are called the "dialogical principle". Although they are opposed, they are inseparable; one cannot exist without the other.

Dialectics −literally, "technique of conversation"− is a philosophical doctrine that studies the confrontation, struggle or contradiction between opposites and how to overcome, harmonize, resolve or transcend them from a higher perspective to try to reach the truth. The confrontation and overcoming is usually presented as the triad thesis-antithesis-synthesis, where thesis and antithesis are the opposites and the synthesis is the harmonization or overcoming of the previous two, which is situated at a higher level.

The opposites (or contraries) arise when defining one thing (since implicitly one is defining its opposite) and when affirming something (since implicitly one is also denying the opposite). Dialectics would be the natural tendency of the human mind to generalize, transcend, integrate or unify opposites in order to achieve a higher consciousness or understanding.

Dialectics has also been considered throughout history in different ways, including:
A brief history of dialectics.
Dialectics and consciousness.

Dialectics can be considered a science in the opposite direction to logic. Logic is top-down and is based on reason, advancing from the general to the particular. Dialectics is ascending and is based on intuition, advancing from the particular to the general, toward higher consciousness.

The dialectic is the universal mechanism of human consciousness. It has two essential components:
  1. The negation (or the opposite). It is a basic mechanism of consciousness that allows us to move from one concept to its opposite. It is the simplest and most universal mechanism.

  2. Synthesis. It is the natural tendency of the mind to go toward a higher consciousness, so that opposites are seen as particular elements of something higher.
Consciousness is that which realizes the synthesis of opposites, which produces consciousness. Consciousness does not arise from confrontation, but from union, from agreement, from the connection, relationship or collaboration between opposites, always contemplated from a higher point of view.

In our mind the two basic modes of consciousness are connected, the two universal poles, the analytic and synthetic modes, in such a way that understanding arises from the connection of these two modes of consciousness. In our brain there is a permanent dialectic between the two hemispheres: the left (analytical, particularistic) and the right (synthetic, generalistic). Their harmonization, connection or synchronization is the manifestation of consciousness at the physical level.

When Hegel speaks of the Absolute, he is referring to supreme consciousness, truth, reality, freedom, perfection, simplicity, order, power, wisdom and unity, and where all concepts (and their opposites) are connected.

First is the Absolute and then the planes of manifestation. Dialectical materialism is wrong, for it considers matter as the foundation of all that exists. And it is just the opposite: the Spirit, the Absolute, comes first, for it is the source of everything else, of the relative world, the dual world.


The dialectic and the philosophical categories.

There is a very close relationship between dialectics and philosophical categories, for the latter constitute the highest level of abstraction of internal and external reality. In this sense: Philosophers also considered dialectical categories:
The meta-dialectic.

Beyond dialectics is meta-dialectics (or transcendental dialectics), which is to go beyond dialectics, to transcend dialectics, to ascend to the metaphysical. Beyond dialectics is metaphysics.

In the history of philosophy there has always been a struggle between dialectic and metaphysics. According to Kant, dialectics is limited to the phenomenal, it cannot go beyond it. In general, we can say that the maximum dialectic is reached with the philosophical categories. The meta-dialectic is metaphysics, which we can only intuit (it is the "mystical", as Wittgenstein said).

We must also ask ourselves if dialectics is or is not dialectics, that is, if there is an anti-dialectic and a possible synthesis of both. If Engels' laws of dialectics are invariant (absolute), then dialectics is not debatable and there is no dialectic of a higher order, dialectics is not dialectic, which is a contradiction, since every concept is supposed to be dialectical. Therefore, dialectics should not be subject to any kind of laws limiting it. Dialectics, by its very nature, must be open.



Addenda

Quotes on the union of opposites.
Bibliography